Presidential Debates: A Question That Will NOT Be Asked

Note: This article was written before the October 3, 2012 Presidential debate in Denver, but my belief that it will remain unasked in the next two debates persists, and the subject, still relevant.

This is only one of the questions (I’m fudging…it’s two) I, as a voter would like to have answered in either tonight’s or the other two Presidential debates. If I were a wagering person, I’d place a significant bet on the fact that it will NOT be asked.

So…if I were the moderator…

“A two part question.

On September 13, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke announced a new round of open-ended “policy accommodation”, which is commonly referred to as “quantitative easing”. The September 13 announcement marks the third round, referred to as “QE3″, which the Federal Reserve explains is aimed at helping “to support the economy”.

There are a lot of people, including a number of economists, voicing concerns about these rounds of “quantitative easing”. There even appears to be some dissent within the Federal Reserve system itself, including a statement of dissent from Richmond Fed President Richard Lacker on September 15. People are concerned about the more than tripling of the Adjusted Monetary Base since 2008, which is unprecedented. Specifically, critics are concerned about a high risk for inflation, some fear runaway inflation.

Question 1. Should the American people be concerned about that tripling of the Adjusted Monetary Base?

Question 2. If economic recovery is one of the stated reasons for this policy, including encouraging banks to lend more money, which reportedly has not increased since credit markets froze four years ago, then why is the Federal Reserve paying the banks interest on the historically high levels of bank reserves they continue to hold?

President Obama, although the Federal Reserve began engaging in these policies before you were inaugurated, most of them occurred at the end of 2008 and have increased since, so there is some presumption you agree with these policies. Obviously, the second question will be slightly different when it is Governor Romney’s turn to answer in that he will have to answer based on whether or not he agrees with that policy, what he might do differently, and why.

President Obama, we’ll turn to your answer first…”

A couple of visuals I’d put up on a screen at the debate to facilitate the discussion…

Chart: Federal Reserve Adjusted Monetary Base as of September 19, 2012

Federal Reserve Adjusted Monetary Base as of September 19, 2012. Source: Federal Reserve

Shadow Government Stats 1980 Alternate Inflation Calculation versus official current

Current official rate of inflation (CPI) versus rate based on government’s 1980 methodology. Source: Shadow Government Statistics based on Bureau of Labor statistics

(archived link)

Current official unemployment rate versus rates based on past methodologies. Source: (archived link) based on Bureau of Labor statistics

Found at Cafe Hayek "The recession and recovery in one picture" http://cafehayek.com/2012/09/the-recession-and-recovery-in-one-picture.html

Source: Federal Reserve, Found at Cafe Hayek “The recession and recovery in one picture” http://cafehayek.com/2012/09/the-recession-and-recovery-in-one-picture.html

VELOCITY OF MONEY = Number of times a dollar turns over in the economy

USD Relative Purchasing Power

Source: Seeking Alpha based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/21153-sufiy/601631-the-gold-bug-manifesto-by-paul-krugman-end-this-depression-now

National Debt not specifically relevant, but interesting, no?…

Per Capita Personal Income to National+Debt

Source: Larry Walker, Jr. based on Bureau of Economic Data and U.S. Treasury

 

I’d give these guys FIVE minutes to answer at least…and that wouldn’t be close to enough.

So, what are YOUR thoughts on these two questions?

AND

What OTHER questions do you think SHOULD be asked but won’t be?

Be sure to use the comment box, below.

Stubborn_Facts

Shelli Dawdy is first and foremost the mother of three children whom she has taught at home via the classical method since removing her children from school in 2001. During her early years as a homeschool mother, she worked part-time as a freelance writer. Born and raised in the Iowa, Shelli and her husband moved to the state of South Dakota in 1997, attracted to its more limited government and friendly tax environment. In 2006, Shelli and her family relocated to Lincoln, Nebraska, when her husband’s employer offered a new position. She took a break from work and politics for a time, recognizing the need to focus solely on her childrens’ schooling with two now of high school age. Distressed by many things she was witnessing on the national political scene and disillusioned about the Republican Party, she decided to start writing again, this time online. Motivated to get involved with others at the grassroots level, she networked with activists on the social media tool, Twitter. She was involved in organizing the first tea party rallies inspired by Rick Santelli’s “rant” on CNBC in February 2009. Recognizing that activism should generate on the local level, she founded Grassroots in Nebraska in March of 2009. The group’s mission is a return to Constitutional, limited government, according to its original meaning. While the group has held several tea party rallies, it’s focus is to take effective action. Among its many projects, GiN successfully coordinated testimony for the hearing of the Nebraska Sovereignty Resolution, networked with other groups to ensure a large show of public support at the hearing, and coordinated follow up support to ensure its passage in April 2010. While working to build up GiN throughout 2009, she was asked to work as writer and producer of the documentary film, A New America, which lays out how Progressivism is responsible for how America has moved away from its Constitutional roots. You can see more of her work on Grassroots in Nebraska (GiN) and StubbornFacts