Our choice. Submission or liberty
Which do you choose? Unlimited submission to nine unelected, unaccountable, politically-connected lawyers, or liberty through nullification?
Which do you choose? Unlimited submission to nine unelected, unaccountable, politically-connected lawyers, or liberty through nullification?
Voting the bums out, suing in court – these things don’t work. It’s time to up the ante, isn’t it? We’re working to nullify.
That statement sums it all up pretty nicely – if you care about the constitution, that is. Those who want to “enforce all laws” – are insane. Or just criminals. Or both.
Some people get the mistaken notion that just because the Tenth Amendment Center supports state nullification of federal acts, that we believe that state governments are inherently "good." Or something like that. Fact is, this view couldn't be further from the truth.
The program is struggling, and it's our view that this is happening not only because the legislation and regulatory plan was massive and overbearing, but also because it is being resisted.
In Federalist #46, James Madison – “Father of the Constitution” – didn’t say “Wait till the next election.” He didn’t say “Take them to court.” And he didn’t say “Give them new rules to follow.” He advised “a refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union.” Learn more here: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/blueprint
If Nullification was good enough for Thomas Jefferson, it’s good enough for us.
Hard to argue with this guy on the right of states to nullify.
No, the federal government is never going to limit it’s own power. We have to take our liberty whether they want us to or not. Are you on board to help out?
“Power corrupts” is a principle proven every day by the imperial congress of the United States.