After you hear what Franklin had to say about executive power and human nature, we think you just might join us in saying "he called it!"
The post Benjamin Franklin’s Warnings on Executive Power first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
this entire topic is a beautiful example of the complete destruction of the original federal republic.
The post Can Biden raise the debt ceiling? first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
We were warned. The powers amassed by each successive president empower whomever occupies the Oval Office to act as a dictator, above the law and beyond any real accountability.
The post Top-5 Ways the Executive Branch Has too Much Power first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The founders knew what would happen if the power to declare and wage war were in the same hands.
The post Who Determines War and Peace? first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
It should be obvious by now that the executive branch wields far too much power. This kind of consolidation was considered one of the greatest threats to liberty. Some warned that the system wouldn’t self-enforce and predicted the “elective despotism” we live under today.
The post Executive Power Warnings first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
today's presidents have more power than the king the colonists fought a long-bloody war to free themselves from.
The post The President Is Not a King first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The American revolutionaries fought a long war to free themselves from a king. So, why do so many people today seem to want an elected king?
The post Why Do So Many People Want a King? first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.In the New York Times, Nicholas Bagley & Abbe R. Gluck: Trump’s Sabotage of Obamacare Is Illegal: A president doesn’t have the right to dispense with laws he dislikes. From the introduction: From the moment he took office, President Trump has used all aspects of his executive power to sabotage the Affordable Care Act. He has issued executive orders,…
It is clear officers can be impeached and removed for major crimes, but what is a “high . . . Misdemeanor?”
In a post at Slate, Professor Jed Shugerman (Fordham) challenged the historical foundations of Justice Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. Olson: It’s worth, however, delving deeper into Scalia’s historical misunderstandings of “complete” executive control over prosecution. Scalia’s dissent in Morrison is simply inconsistent with its originalist commitments and not worth resuscitating for that fact alone. In this post,…