“To understand the significance of this, suppose that the U.S. Congress or British Parliament had just passed a law, but one lobbying group didn’t like it. Suppose that the President or the British Prime Minister convened a closed meeting with a small group of invited ‘stakeholders’ and agreed on a ‘strawman proposal’ to amend the legislation. The new legislation makes the first group happy but most other stakeholders unhappy. But nevertheless, the chief executives went on to order its executive branch to implement the revised legislation without any review and approval by the Congress/Parliament. That is exactly what ICANN did.”
ICANN: How top-down ‘implementation’ replaced bottom-up policymaking
- Post author:The Freedom Watch Staff
- Post published:September 16, 2013
- Post category:Network Archives / The Freedom Watch
Tags: Bankocracy, CLibertyC, constitutional liberty coalition, economic Trends, Essays, for life and liberty, Land Of The Flea, Resistance, Rogue State, sound money, statism, technology, The Freedom Watch
The Freedom Watch Staff
News before it is news for the resistance from a trusted correspondent.
The Freedom Watch Network
You must be logged in to post a comment.