“The international community—which includes many multi-tribal, ethnic, racial, or sectarian states—frowns on solutions that formally or implicitly break up states. Many have their own minorities that might be encouraged to break away. Thus, arguments are used that it’s a form of apartheid or that boundaries cannot be drawn exactly and will always leave some unfortunate souls on the other side of the line. In South Africa, apartheid was forced separation using armed might of a minority against a majority. In Iraq and Libya, such decentralized governance would have to be voluntary and would reflect existing ethno-sectarian or tribal areas, respectively.”
Decentralize to Neutralize Turmoil in Middle East
- Post author:The Freedom Watch Staff
- Post published:September 5, 2013
- Post category:Network Archives / The Freedom Watch
Tags: Bankocracy, CLibertyC, constitutional liberty coalition, economic Trends, Essays, for life and liberty, Middle East, new world order, Resistance, sound money, State-Smashing, The Freedom Watch, War & Peace
The Freedom Watch Staff
News before it is news for the resistance from a trusted correspondent.
The Freedom Watch Network
You must be logged in to post a comment.