The legislation would prohibit any government entity from seeking, or any court from enforcing, assisting, or supporting, a reverse-keyword or reverse-location demand issued by a government entity or court in this state or any other state.
The post California Assembly Passes Bill to Restrict Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The legislation would prohibit any government entity from seeking, or any court from enforcing, assisting, or supporting, a reverse keyword or reverse location demand issued by a government entity or court in California or any other state. The bill would also prohibit a person or California entity from complying with a reverse keyword or reverse location demand. Any information gathered in violation of the law would be inadmissible in court.
The post California Assembly Committee Passes Bill to Restrict Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The legislation would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-location court orders, reverse-keyword court orders, reverse-location requests, and reverse-keyword requests.
The post Delaware Bill Would Restrict Geofence Location Tracking and Reverse Keyword Searches first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The new law requires police to get a warrant before obtaining reverse-location information for electronic devices within a geofence or by using cell cite records in most situations.
The post Now in Effect: Utah Law Restricts Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The legislation would prohibit any government entity from seeking, or any court from enforcing, assisting, or supporting, a reverse keyword or reverse location demand issued by a government entity or court in California or any other state. The bill would also prohibit a person or California entity from complying with a reverse keyword or reverse location demand. Any information gathered in violation of the law would be inadmissible in court.
The post Second California Assembly Committee Passes Bill to Restrict Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The legislation would prohibit any government entity from seeking, or any court from enforcing, assisting, or supporting, a reverse keyword or reverse location demand issued by a government entity or court in California or any other state. The bill would also prohibit a person or California entity from complying with a reverse keyword or reverse location demand. Any information gathered in violation of the law would be inadmissible in court.
The post California Assembly Committee Passes Bill to Restrict Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The new law requires police to get a warrant before obtaining reverse-location information for electronic devices within a geofence or by using cell cite records in most situations.
The post Signed as Law: Utah Restricts Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The legislation would require police to get a warrant before obtaining reverse-location information for electronic devices within a geofence or by using cell cite records in most situations.
The post To the Governor: Utah Bill Would Restrict Geofence Location Tracking first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
Nullification Movement News, Episode 6. Reports include:
-Sound Money, anti-CBDC bill passes Missouri Senate
-Taking on Geolocation tracking and Gun Purchase Surveillance
-Nullifying Federal Gun Control
In effect, the passage of A3306 would end a process called “geofencing.” Reverse search warrants authorize police to search broad geographical areas to determine who was near a given place at a given time.
The post New York Assembly Bill Would Prohibit Geolocation Tracking and Geofencing Warrants first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.